Re: Current summit

[Poet/Joshua Drake <poet@linuxports.com>]

Hello,

This would be a "suggested" license correct? Not a Required license?

Joshua Drake


On Fri, 29 Sep 2000, Guylhem Aznar wrote:

>Very few people could made it because of the football game filling up
>every hotel around and Rosh Hashanah starting today.
>
>However we are doing some great work and would like some immediate
>feedback.
>
>The most important point is the license policy.
>
>Since we could not find a good agreement on the licenses, we are
>thinking about merging the LDPL and the LDP Manifesto as the "license
>policy", explaining which license could be used, etc.
>
>David, what do you think about that? Would you like to take care of the
>merging? We will provide you a draft.
>
>Guylhem
>
>

-- 
--
<COMPANY>CommandPrompt	- http://www.commandprompt.com	</COMPANY>
<PROJECT>OpenDocs, LLC.	- http://www.opendocs.org	</PROJECT>
<PROJECT>LinuxPorts 	- http://www.linuxports.com     </PROJECT>
<WEBMASTER>LDP		- http://www.linuxdoc.org	</WEBMASTER>
--
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," 
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom. 
--


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org